Skip to main content

C# Snippet - Using the Conditional Attribute [Beginner]


You probably know about methods like Debug.WriteLine and Debug.Assert. A big part of their use is that they only do stuff if you are running a application compiled in Debug mode. If you are running in release mode, however, its like those calls in your code don't even exist - this way you can feel free to put helpful debug messages and checks in your code without worrying about the release version of the application being affected. Have you ever wondered how this is done?

Well, what happens in the end is that those calls really don't exist in a release compiled version of an application - they are literally ripped out of the code. But there is no magic going on here, and nothing that is specially restricted to Microsoft's own code - its actually just a plain old method attribute, one that we can use in our own code if we wanted to.

Heres the method signature for Debug.WriteLine:
[ConditionalAttribute("DEBUG")]
public static void WriteLine(string message)
 
That ConditionalAttribute tag on the method signature means that the method call only really exists if the code is compiled in Debug mode (i.e., the symbol DEBUG is defined). For instance, take a look at the following (very simple) chunk of code:
namespace ConditionalAttributeTest
{
  class Program
  {
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
      Debug.WriteLine("I'm a message!");
    }
  }
}
 
When this code is compiled in debug mode, if you take a look at the MSIL (Microsoft Intermediate Language, the language C# is compiled into) inside the executable, you will see the following:
.class private auto ansi beforefieldinit Program
    extends [mscorlib]System.Object
{
  .method public hidebysig specialname rtspecialname 
      instance void .ctor() cil managed
  {
    .maxstack 8
    L_0000: ldarg.0 
    L_0001: call instance void [mscorlib]System.Object::.ctor()
    L_0006: ret 
  }

  .method private hidebysig static void Main(string[] args) cil managed
  {
    .entrypoint
    .maxstack 8
    L_0000: nop 
    L_0001: ldstr "I\'m a message!"
    L_0006: call void [System]System.Diagnostics.Debug::WriteLine(string)
    L_000b: nop 
    L_000c: ret 
  }
}
 
Now in all that mess of MSIL, you can probably see the call to Debug.WriteLine that prints out that string. But if you compile the exact same code in release mode, and look at the MSIL, you see the following:
.class private auto ansi beforefieldinit Program
    extends [mscorlib]System.Object
{
  .method public hidebysig specialname rtspecialname 
      instance void .ctor() cil managed
  {
    .maxstack 8
    L_0000: ldarg.0 
    L_0001: call instance void [mscorlib]System.Object::.ctor()
    L_0006: ret 
  }

  .method private hidebysig static void Main(string[] args) cil managed
  {
    .entrypoint
    .maxstack 8
    L_0000: ret 
  }
}
 
Now there is no trace of the Debug.WriteLine call at all - even the string we were going to print out, it is completely gone.

So how do we use this attribute? Well it's as simple as what was done for Debug.WriteLine - just drop the attribute on top of the method that you want to conditionally compile out. It doesn't have to be the DEBUG symbol, either - it can be for symbols you have defined yourself. For instance, say you wanted to gather some performance data when the symbol TIMERS is defined. You could have some code like the following:
public static class TimerCalls
{
  private static Dictionary<string, Stopwatch> _Stopwatches
    = new Dictionary<string, Stopwatch>();

  [ConditionalAttribute("TIMERS")]
  public static void StartStopwatch(string key)
  {
    if(_Stopwatches.ContainsKey(key))
    { return; } //Stopwatch already running

    _Stopwatches.Add(key, Stopwatch.StartNew()); 
  }

  [ConditionalAttribute("TIMERS")]
  public static void StopStopwatch(string key)
  {
    if(!_Stopwatches.ContainsKey(key))
    { return; } //No such stopwatch currently
    var watch = _Stopwatches[key];
    watch.Stop();
    _Stopwatches.Remove(key);
    Console.WriteLine(String.Format("Timer: {0}, {1}ms", key,
        watch.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds));
  }
}
 
The use of the conditional attribute there means that those two calls - StartStopwatch and StopStopwatch - only exist when the TIMERS symbol is defined. So if you take the following code and compile and run it:
#define TIMERS

class Program
{
  static void Main(string[] args)
  {
    TimerCalls.StartStopwatch("SumNumbers");
    int total = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++)
    { total += i; }
    Console.WriteLine(total);
    TimerCalls.StopStopwatch("SumNumbers");

    Console.Read();
  }
}
 
You get this output:
49995000
Timer: SumNumbers, 2.7013ms 
But if you take out that #define TIMERS statement at the top, you get this output:
49995000
 
Now I know this could technically all be done with#If statements, but using #If statements everywhere starts to really clutter code. In my opinion it makes code harder to read - plus you end up having to if-def out every single instance of whatever you are conditionally compiling. Using the ConditionalAttribute guarantees that every call is automatically stripped out - no worries that you missed one, or someone else added one in and forgot to add the if-def.

Well, that's it for ConditionalAttribute, another one of those obscure but handy features of C# (and the other .NET languages). The Visual Studio solution with the TimerCalls class is below, if you want to grab it and play around. 


Source Files:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C# Snippet - Shuffling a Dictionary [Beginner]

Randomizing something can be a daunting task, especially with all the algorithms out there. However, sometimes you just need to shuffle things up, in a simple, yet effective manner. Today we are going to take a quick look at an easy and simple way to randomize a dictionary, which is most likely something that you may be using in a complex application. The tricky thing about ordering dictionaries is that...well they are not ordered to begin with. Typically they are a chaotic collection of key/value pairs. There is no first element or last element, just elements. This is why it is a little tricky to randomize them. Before we get started, we need to build a quick dictionary. For this tutorial, we will be doing an extremely simple string/int dictionary, but rest assured the steps we take can be used for any kind of dictionary you can come up with, no matter what object types you use. Dictionary < String , int > origin = new Dictionary < string , int >(); ...

C# WPF Printing Part 2 - Pagination [Intermediate]

About two weeks ago, we had a tutorial here at SOTC on the basics of printing in WPF . It covered the standard stuff, like popping the print dialog, and what you needed to do to print visuals (both created in XAML and on the fly). But really, that's barely scratching the surface - any decent printing system in pretty much any application needs to be able to do a lot more than that. So today, we are going to take one more baby step forward into the world of printing - we are going to take a look at pagination. The main class that we will need to do pagination is the DocumentPaginator . I mentioned this class very briefly in the previous tutorial, but only in the context of the printing methods on PrintDialog , PrintVisual (which we focused on last time) and PrintDocument (which we will be focusing on today). This PrintDocument function takes a DocumentPaginator to print - and this is why we need to create one. Unfortunately, making a DocumentPaginator is not as easy as...

C# WPF Tutorial - Implementing IScrollInfo [Advanced]

The ScrollViewer in WPF is pretty handy (and quite flexible) - especially when compared to what you had to work with in WinForms ( ScrollableControl ). 98% of the time, I can make the ScrollViewer do what I need it to for the given situation. Those other 2 percent, though, can get kind of hairy. Fortunately, WPF provides the IScrollInfo interface - which is what we will be talking about today. So what is IScrollInfo ? Well, it is a way to take over the logic behind scrolling, while still maintaining the look and feel of the standard ScrollViewer . Now, first off, why in the world would we want to do that? To answer that question, I'm going to take a an example from a tutorial that is over a year old now - Creating a Custom Panel Control . In that tutorial, we created our own custom WPF panel (that animated!). One of the issues with that panel though (and the WPF WrapPanel in general) is that you have to disable the horizontal scrollbar if you put the panel in a ScrollV...